How to Write an Expert Opinion in an ADA Case: A guide on how to write a solid expert opinion.
What is a Disability?
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) defines a disability as “a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of such individual; a record of such an impairment; or being regarded as having such an impairment.” 42 U.S.C. 12102(2). The ADA also states that the determination of whether an individual has a disability must be made without regard to the ameliorative effects of mitigating measures including “medication, medical supplies, equipment, or appliances, low-vision devices (which do not include ordinary eyeglasses or contact lenses), prosthetics including limbs and devices, hearing aids and cochlear implants or other implantable hearing devices, mobility devices, or oxygen therapy equipment and supplies; use of assistive technology; reasonable accommodations or auxiliary aids or services; psychotherapy, behavioral therapy, or physical therapy; and reasonable modifications to policies, practices, or procedures.” 42 U.S.C. 12102(4)(E).
The court in Toyota Motor Manufacturing v Williams stated that “the term ‘substantially limits’ indicates that the individual must be restricted in
How to Write an Expert Opinion in an ADA Case: A guide on how to write a solid expert opinion.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that employers provide reasonable accommodation for employees with disabilities. To establish whether or not an accommodation is reasonable, courts often rely on the opinions of vocational experts. But what exactly does a court need from a vocational expert to make this determination?
Analysis of ADA cases shows that while courts appear to generally accept the testimony of vocational experts, they often request more comprehensive reports and/or return experts’ reports for revisions. In other words, if you don’t follow a certain formula or structure, your report may not be accepted by the court.
This article discusses common mistakes and omissions made by vocational experts in ADA cases and proposes solutions on how to avoid making them. The objective is to help vocational experts write better reports that meet legal standards and are more likely to be accepted by courts as a legitimate source of information.
How to Write an Expert Opinion in an ADA Case
A guide on how to write a solid expert opinion.
In the case of Murchison v. FedEx Smart Post, Inc., the plaintiff sued his former employer, FedEx Smart Post, for disability discrimination and retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The case is pending before Judge James S. Moody of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
In this particular case, FedEx Smart Post hired Dr. Richard Goldberg to act as their expert witness on matters relating to the plaintiff’s work performance and ability to perform the essential functions of his job. In Dr. Goldberg’s opinion, Mr. Murchison was terminated due to his inability to perform his job duties and not because of a disability or discrimination by FedEx Smart Post in any way.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) state that expert witnesses must be clearly identified in a party’s statement of material facts if they are going to be utilized during trial and that they must provide “a written report” with their opinion on each issue that they are going to testify about at trial.[1] If a party fails to provide written notice or a written report from their expert prior to trial, then that expert witness
The purpose of this article is to discuss the issue of expert opinions in ADA cases, and to provide a guide for attorneys on how to write a solid expert opinion. It is the author’s belief that the most important part of any case is the expert opinion. Without an expert opinion, a case can be dismissed on summary judgment.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against “qualified individuals with disabilities” by public and private employers, including state and local governments. See 42 U.S.C.A. Section 12101 et seq.(West 2015). In order to make out a prima facie case under the ADA, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she: (1) has a disability; (2) can perform the essential functions of his or her job either with or without reasonable accommodation; and (3) was fired because of his disability. See McBride v. BIC Consumer Prods., 583 F.3d 92, 95 (2d Cir 2009).
If you are representing a plaintiff in an ADA case, it cannot be overstated that your client must have an expert witness who has reviewed all relevant medical records, and is able to explain how your client’s condition meets or does
There are three basic types of expert opinions:
1. In this type of opinion, the expert is asked to give his or her opinion on whether a person’s condition meets the definition of a disability under the ADA. The expert may be asked to complete a form, such as a Residual Functional Capacity (RFC) form, or just asked to write an opinion. The most common situation where this type of opinion may be needed is when the individual has applied for Social Security Disability benefits and needs to show that he or she was also entitled to reasonable accommodations in the workplace. Some other reasons might include an individual who is trying to increase their disability benefits from private disability insurance or Veterans’ disability benefits.
2. In this type of opinion, the expert is asked by an employer to determine whether an employee with a given medical condition can return to work and if so, whether there are any restrictions or limitations that must be accommodated by the employer. This type of opinion usually involves determining whether there are specific essential functions of a job that cannot be performed by an employee with given limitations. This determination may involve assessing the physical demands of work as well as requirements of jobs such as lifting, bending, standing, sitting, driving and operating equipment.
3
Evaluating the medical evidence in a case involving an alleged disability and whether or not an individual is “disabled” as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a complex process. The ADA defines legally disabled as:
“A person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; who has record of such an impairment; or who is regarded as having such an impairment.”
In order to make these determinations, it is necessary to review medical records and other relevant documents, interview the client, and perform a clinical examination. A full review of documents and examination often take considerable time. Typically, they are performed before it is known whether or not there will be payment for services rendered, so they can be quite costly. It requires considerable expertise to review all of this material, to critically evaluate what it means, and then to write a persuasive opinion on its significance.
A “disability” under the ADA is defined as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. A major life activity is a basic activity that an average person can do with little or no difficulty.
In analyzing whether someone has a disability under the ADA, one must first determine whether they have an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity. If they do not have such an impairment, then they are not disabled within the meaning of the ADA and the analysis ends there.
If the claimant does have an impairment, then next one must determine if it substantially limits a major life activity. Examples of impairments include: diabetes, depression, hypertension, heart problems, asthma, back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome, and HIV/AIDS. Major life activities include: walking, seeing, hearing, breathing, working and performing manual tasks. If a claimant’s impairment does not significantly interfere with their ability to perform any major life activity (e.g., someone with asthma whose symptoms are controlled by medication), then they do not have a disability under the ADA.
